The reaction of the blogosphere's "Christian hawks" to the Valerie Plame affair reveals a new uncertainty and even disillusionment among those who looked to George W. Bush to "restore honor, dignity and integrity to the White House.
Responses to the revelations of the past few days fall into four categories:
Ignore the whole thing:
Catholic blogger Chris Burgwald writes a lot at Veritas about the alleged negative skewing of media coverage of Iraq, but as of Wednesday morning, there was not a word discussing the Plame scandal.Protestant Mark Byron attacks Paul Krugman's blistering tone about Bush corruption in today's New York Times, but avoids mentioning the most recent accusations made against the administration.
Wait and see:
Joshua Claybourn links to Jeff Cooper and urges readers to learn more about the case without offering his own view yet.Jeffrey Collins specifically endorses the "wait-and-see" approach while he counsels the White House to avoid the temptation to stonewall.
The guys in Fly Over Country think it's a serious enough matter to bring down Bush, but are reserving judgment and counseling patience until more facts are in.
Agonize about it.
Donald Sensing is obviously torn. He had seen Joseph Wilson at a foreign relations seminar and initially wrote this about him:I happen to have been a seminar attendee in 1993 in which Wilson was a speaker one day. There were only about two dozen attendees, some of us military and others civilian government factotums from all branches of government. So we had very informal and engaging discussions with the daily speakers. I found Wilson to be expertly knowledgeable on the Middle East and quite sober-minded. I rate his credibility extremely high, so I find the charges he has made very credible and very disturbing.As the comments from his conservative readers piled up, Sensing began to back off. Finally, he joined the "denial" crowd:
Bill Hobbs posts that Plame's "secret identity" probably wasn't ever really secret to begin with, and that Wilson is less balanced and sober-minded than he seemed to me to be 10 years ago, writing in The Nation that under Bush, "America has entered one of it periods of historical madness." So now I am starting to think that the whole doth stinketh of manufactured scandal.This position, of course, ignores the substance of the formal request for investigation made by the CIA:
CIA lawyers followed up the notification this month by answering 11 questions from the Justice Department, affirming that the woman’s identity was classified, that whoever released it was not authorized to do so and that the news media would not have been able to guess her identity without the leak, the senior officials said.Sensing has been transformed into the fourth category:
Engage in denial:
By this morning, Sensing was deeply immersed in denial and citing Robert Novak's careful phrasings to prove that no law had been broken.
It must be difficult for these people. The Plame Affair reveals the very heart of this administration. While they have claimed to put the security of the nation above all else, even to the point of dragging us into a war with little international support, it is now becoming clearer day by day that the national security is far less important to them than their own political power. Honor, dignity and integrity have vanished like so much mist. Some of us knew it was a mirage all along.
UPDATE: Chris Burgwald has posted here in response to my entry. I'll leave it to you to "classify" his views. Also, my apologies to Chris for initially misspelling his name and my thanks to him for his politeness in drawing my attention to it.
FURTHER UPDATE: Josh Claybourn has also posted in response, and basically maintains his position and his open mind. Someone commented on Calpundit's link to my post in a way that seemed to say I was criticizing the "wait-and-see" position. I'm not. It's quite reasonable at this point for those who support Bush and the war to take their time, see what facts come out, and digest all this.
FURTHER UPDATE: First, I owe Mark Byron an apology. He had mentioned the Plame matter in a posting about a number of matters over the weekend and I just missed it. He has now posted two extended discussions and recommends an independent counsel and jail cells for higher-ups if they ordered subordinates to leak.
Posted by Allen at September 30, 2003 08:54 AMWhat is it about Bush and his administration that made empty platitudes more convincing than those under Clinton or even Reagan_ I have heard more bald-faced lies and distortions in the past three years than I have ever heard in my short time on this Earth, and I just shake my head in wonderment when the American public eats it up.
My only thought is that after 9/11, a lot of people needed a leader, and needed that leader to be honest. So they gave him a measure of credibility (I would say credulousness) that they had not been willing to give to prior presidents.
The only reason that I can think of as to why it's failing at this point is that unlike FDR or Eisenhower, Iraq never had the deep support that WWI or Korea had; it was always, much like the platitudes, on the surface.
I really agree with you that the Plame affair reveals the very heart of this administration, and as far as I'm concerned, it's blackened and shriveled beyond repair. And frankly, I think that's really, really a disservice to this country; conservatives don't deserve the hero they've picked. They deserve so much better.
Posted by: Kenneth G. Cavness at September 30, 2003 01:17 PMWill this be the thing that finally wakes up the mass of citizens who still seem to think that Bush and his crowd are full of "integrity", "honor", and "straight-talkers", who speak with "moral clarity"__ Is it not OBVIOUS that this was done to intimidate other dissenting opinions from coming out_ Who out there actually believes that this was done WITHOUT Karl Rove's knowledge_ Does that seem likely_ I don't think so..I am afraid Bush will circle the wagons, and at most sacrifice a couple of low-level flunkies, while expecting us to believe that Rove had nothing to do with it, This is one citizen who will not buy that swill!
Posted by: at September 30, 2003 01:37 PMI don't think it will be so easy to pin it on the flunkies. Not everyone has access to the information disclosed. Not everyone has access to big-name reporters. Even Howie Kurtz was taking this seriously on CNN midday after he talked to one of the 6 reporters who were shopped this story before Novak went to press.
Posted by: Allen at September 30, 2003 01:49 PMI don't see how, if she was part of the operational wing of the CIA as calpundit is explaining, the WH can scapegoat this on underlings.
Someplace along the way one or more persons with security status high enough to acquire this information had to have passed it along.
Whoever it was -- and the orignal sources) may or may not be in the White House -- from that point and forward, anyone who passed on the information is complicit, I would think.
It's hard to believe that in the administration of the son of a CIA Director/President, in the administration of a president "at war", anyone could have outed this agent without realizing the gravity of what they were doing.
This has got to be about more than it appears as yet . . .
Posted by: at September 30, 2003 02:12 PMI think the first place to look is those people who had received the Tenant October memo to remove the Niger allegation: Rice, Hadley and Gerson.
Posted by: Allen at September 30, 2003 02:37 PMI did mention l'affair Plume yesterday and will do so again. I'm just not wringing my hands over this one.
Posted by: Mark Byron at September 30, 2003 03:26 PMI followed your link to Sensing's site. The line he's attributing to Wilson, "writing in The Nation that under Bush, 'America has entered one of it periods of historical madness,'" is completely false. That line was written by John LeCarré in the Times (London) back in March. I've sent email to Sensing pointing out this fact.
Posted by: at September 30, 2003 04:46 PMI'm waiting for the "smear Wilson and/or Plame" reaction, which to some extent has already started, and will get louder. However the outcome of all this will probaly be as marty described above. The "It can't be Rove, he's not that stupid" meme is already in play.
Posted by: kurt at September 30, 2003 07:50 PM